【摘要】 年满14周岁但尚未满16周岁的相对负刑事责任的行为人能否被界定为转化型抢劫罪的行为主体,在我国一直备受争议。相对刑事责任年龄人转化抢劫行为的判断,应对转化前后的两个行为进行整体评价更为妥当,我国《刑法》第269条转化型抢劫罪中"犯盗窃罪"中的罪,应解释为"罪行"而非"罪名"。根据相对刑事责任年龄人实施转化抢劫的社会危害性、罪刑法定原则及未成年人犯罪的刑事政策等方面,分析得出相对刑事责任年龄人可以成为转化型抢劫罪主体的结论。更多还原

【Abstract】 Whether the relative age of criminal responsibility people under the age of 16 are under 14 years of age can constitute the crime of conversion robbery,has been controversial in China. It is more appropriate to evaluate the behavior of the person in criminal responsibility for the conversion of the two acts before and after the transformation. The crime of " committing theft" in the crime of conversion robbery in Article 269 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China should be interpreted as " offenses" rather than " charges". In this paper,according to the relative age of criminal responsibility people to implement the social harm to the robbery,the principle of legally prescribed punishment and the criminal policy of juvenile delinquency,the relative age of criminal responsibility people can become the main body of transformed robbery.更多还原