【摘要】 美国、英国和中国台湾地区三地工程技术类专业认证体系存在诸多相似之处:认证机构都是由工程行业领域或教育领域的权威人士共同发起成立,都是获教育主管部门认可的非官方、非盈利的社会组织;都成为《悉尼协议》的正式成员,并将其与本科层次工程技术类专业对应起来;认证标准都以学生为中心,都将"是否有利于学生预期目标的达成"作为各项指标评判的重要依据。但就认证机构职能范围和管理体系以及认证指标具体要求来看三者之间存在些许差异,应该明晰本科技术类专业与国际协议之间的对应关系,构建中国特色工程技术教育专业认证体系;加强行业组织的能力建设,充分发挥其在专业认证体系中的主体作用;完善职业资格注册制度,推动专业认证体系与职业资格注册制度有效衔接。更多还原

【Abstract】 There are some similarities in accreditation systems for engineering programs among the U.S., the UK and Chinese Taiwan. All of them are non-governmental and nonprofit social organizations with official approval of education administrative departments, which were established by the authorities in engineering or education industries. They all are official members of Sydney Accord. Besides, they all have established student-centered accreditation criteria and regard "contribution to the fulfillment of students’ intended goals" as an important basis for each evaluation indicator. There are also some differences among them in terms of the function and management system of accreditation institutions, and the requirements of these criteria. Learning form the experience of overseas organizations, organizations in Chinese mainland should try to understand the corresponding relation between undergraduate engineering majors and international accords to construct the accreditation system of engineering education with Chinese characteristics. They should also enhance the construction of industrial organizations and improve the professional qualification registration system.更多还原