节点文献

格氏栲自然保护区22种常见木本植物的生态策略

Study on Ecological Strategies of 22 Common Woody Plants in Castanopsis kawakami Nature Reserve

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 徐鹏程游章湉纪宇皝周嘉聪张秋芳郑蔚刘小飞林伟盛杨智杰杨玉盛

【Author】 XU Pengcheng;YOU Zhangtian;JI Yuhuang;ZHOU Jiacong;ZHANG Qiufang;ZHENG Wei;LIU Xiaofei;LIN Weisheng;YANG Zhijie;YANG Yusheng;School of Geographical Sciences,Fujian Normal University;State Key Laboratory for Subtropical Mountain Ecology of the Ministry of Science and Technology and Fujian Province,Fujian Normal University;Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems,South China Botanical Garden,Chinese Academy of Sciences;Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany,South China Botanical Garden,Chinese Academy of Sciences;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences;

【通讯作者】 杨智杰;

【机构】 福建师范大学地理科学学院福建师范大学湿润亚热带山地生态国家重点实验室培育基地中国科学院华南植物园退化生态系统植被恢复与管理重点实验室中国科学院华南植物园广东省应用植物学重点实验室中国科学院大学华东师范大学生态与环境科学学院

【摘要】 植物的生态策略是影响群落构建结果的重要因子。以三明格氏栲保护区22种常见木本植物作为研究对象,探讨该区典型植物的生态策略组成、变化规律以及与群落构建结果的一致性,为解释该区植被的演变过程、系统功能变化提供理论依据。结果显示:1)22种常见木本植物的生态策略可分为七类,分别为C/CSR、CS/CSR、S/CSR、CS、S/CS、CSR和SR策略,其中CS/CSR和S/CSR策略为主导策略,所占比例分别达到34.1%和32.3%; 2)两类主要的策略变化轴C/CSR-CS-S/CS和C/CSR-CS/CSR-S/CSR都表现为靠近C策略一端选择低构建成本快速收益,倾向于大比叶面积(SLA)与低叶干物质含量(LDMC)、单位面积碳(Carea)、氮(Narea)、磷(Parea)含量的性状组合,靠近S策略一端的性状组合则相反,选择高构建成本缓慢收益;3)与群落建立相关的策略方案,22种植物的竞争能力(C)和压力忍耐能力(S)与物种相对重要值显著相关,相对重要值高的物种压力忍耐力(S)较强。这意味着生境过滤效应使物种聚集S策略可能有更大的生存机会。与C和S策略相比,SR/CSR倾向于维持更快的投资回报和繁殖回报。综上所述,本区植物存在多种经济权衡,但高构建成本缓慢收益的压力忍耐型物种有着更大的生存机遇。

【Abstract】 22 woody species were investigated in C.kawakamii reserve to understand composition and variation of strategies, and to test consistency with community assembly, which would provide theoretical basis for succession and ecosystem function. The results showed that :(1)22 woody species were characterized by seven strategies: C/CSR, CS/CSR, S/CSR, CS, S/CS, CSR and SR, among which CS/CSR And S/CSR strategy as the dominant strategy, accounting for 34.1% and 32.3% respectively;(2)Trade off between C/CSR-CS-S/CS and C/CSR-CS/CSR-S/CSR startegies axis performed similar trends. Plants clustered around C strategy exibited high SLA, low LDMC, Carea, Narea, Parea, but clustered around S strategy had opposite selection; Associated strategy scheme with community establishment, 22 plant’s competitiveness(C) and tress tolerance(S) were significant correlations with their relative importance values, which implied habitat filtration effect enables species clustered S strategy may have greater survival opportunities.Compared to C and S strategy, SR/CSR tended to sustain faster investment returns and involves return of a large proportion in propagules; To sum up, there are various economic tradeoffs among plants, but plants which have slow return strategy will get more opportunities to survive.

【基金】 海峡联合基金项目(U150520116)
  • 【文献出处】 亚热带资源与环境学报 ,Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment , 编辑部邮箱 ,2019年04期
  • 【分类号】S718.5
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】318
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络