【摘要】 在《电子商务法》的立法过程中,第38条第2款关于平台经营者责任的规定引发了激烈的争论,经历了从"连带责任"到"补充责任",最终定为"相应责任"的过程。在实践中,平台经营者未尽到对商家资质资格的审核义务,表现为争议发生时不能向消费者提供真实、有效的经营主体信息,此时所承担的"相应责任"实际上就是《消费者权益保护法》第44条第1款所规定的附条件不真正连带责任,平台经营者的实际担责状况并未发生深刻改变。即使《电子商务法》将"相应责任"延伸到公法领域,引入并强化平台经营者未尽到审核义务时的行政责任,预防功能也极其有限。为落实《电子商务法》确立的均衡保障理念,应注重发挥民事责任的作用,通过动态系统论改进平台经营者的责任认定。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the legislative process of the E-commerce Law,the Article 38 (2) concerning platforms liability sparks hot debates,experiencing from "joint and several liability"to "supplementary responsibility",and to "corresponding responsibility " at last. In practice,the situations that platforms don ’t fulfill the obligation to review the qualifications of merchants mostly reflect that platforms cannot provide the real and effective business entity information to consumers. At this time,"corresponding responsibility"is actually the untrue joint and several liability with attached conditions of the Article 44 (1) of the Consumer Protection Law,and the actual accountability of platforms doesn’t change profoundly. Even if the E-commerce Law extends the"corresponding responsibility"to the public law field,and introduces and strengthens the administrative responsibility of platforms which fail to fulfill the review obligation,the prevention function of administrative responsibility is extremely limited. In order to implement the concept of balanced guarantee established by the E-commerce Law,we should pay more attention to the role of civil liability,and further improve the liability identification of platforms on the basis of dynamic system theory.更多还原