目的通过与后外侧入路手术相比,探讨SuperPATH入路行人工全髋关节置换术(total hip arthroplasty,THA)的临床疗效。方法选择2016年1月—12月收治并符合选择标准的84例髋关节疾病患者纳入研究并随机分为两组,其中40例采用SuperPATH入路行THA(SuperPATH组),44例采用后外侧入路行THA(PSA组)。两组患者性别、年龄、体质量指数、疾病类型、合并基础疾病及术前下肢血栓形成、髋关节Harris评分等一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。比较两组手术时间、术中失血量、切口长度、术后引流量、下地时间以及术后髋关节功能Harris评分、简明健康调查量表(SF-36量表)评分,X线片复查示假体位置。结果两组患者术后均获随访,随访时间6~18个月,平均10.3个月。SuperPATH组手术时间、术中失血量、切口长度、术后引流量及下地时间均优于PSA组(P<0.05)。SuperPATH组术后2周及1个月时Harris评分显著优于PSA组(P<0.05);术后3、6个月时两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。末次随访时,SuperPATH组SF-36量表各项评...
【英文摘要】
Objective To compare the effectiveness between SuperPATH approach and posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty(THA). Methods Between January 2016 and December 2016, 84 patients with hip disease were included in the study and randomly divided into 2 groups. Forty patients were treated with THA via SuperPATH approach(SuperPATH group), and 44 patients were treated with THA via posterolateral approach(PSA group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, the type of disease, ...
【更新日期】
2018-01-26
【分类号】
R687.4
【正文快照】
人工全髋关节置换术(total hip arthroplasty,THA)是治疗终末期髋关节骨性关节炎、股骨头缺血性坏死、先天性髋关节发育不良髋部疾患的有效术式之一[1]。传统THA采用后外侧入路,对髋周软组织损伤大、失血多,术后患者恢复时间长,且发生脱位风险较高[2-4]。为此,学者们为降低THA?