【摘要】 目的:观察神经肌肉电刺激联合康妇消炎栓治疗慢性盆腔炎性疼痛的疗效。方法:选取慢性盆腔炎性疼痛患者84例,依据治疗方法不同分为观察组和对照组各42例。对照组予以康妇消炎栓治疗。观察组在对照组基础上加用神经肌肉电刺激治疗,比较两组临床疗效、疼痛评分、不良反应。结果:治疗后观察组临床治疗总有效率为95.24%,高于对照组的80.95%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组疼痛评分治疗前比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,观察组疼痛评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。不良反应发生率观察组为2.38%,低于对照组的14.29%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:神经肌肉电刺激联合康妇消炎栓治疗慢性盆腔炎性疼痛疗效优于单纯使用康妇消炎栓的疗效。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective:To observe clinical efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with Kangfu Xiaoyan suppository in treatment of chronic pelvic inflammatory pain.Methods:84 patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory pain were selected and divided into observation group(n = 42) and control group(n = 42) according to the different treatment methods.The control group was treated with Kangfu Xiaoyan suppository,while the observation group was treated with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the basis of that of the control group.The clinical efficacies,pain scores and adverse reactions of the two groups were analyzed and compared.Results:After the treatment,the total effective rate in the observation group was 95.24%,which was significantly higher than that of the control group(80.95%,P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the pain score between the two groups before the treatment(P>0.05); however,after the treatment,the pain score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 2.38%,which was lower than that of the control group 14.29%,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:Neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with Kangfu Xiaoyan suppository in the treatment of chronic pelvic inflammatory pain is more effective than single Kangfu Xiaoyan suppository.更多还原