【摘要】 关于福建少林寺,自上世纪80年代提出"泉州少林说"之后,相继又有"莆田少林说"和"福清少林说",并纷纷建寺筑院,以力图证明其昔日的存在。同时,随之冠以"南少林"之名的武术赛事、学术论坛、人物报道乃至夏令营等,更是丰富多样。值得注意的是,2012年8月的《泉州晚报》等数家媒体,又先后刊登了有关发现永春少林寺的消息。这样一来,使得原本众说纷纭的"八闽何处南少林"越加显得扑朔迷离。文章就支撑"福清少林说""泉州少林说"以及其他相关南少林文献史料进行辨析、考证,继而从移民史视角对福建少林寺的历史缘起进行了探索,并提出福清、永春"少林"寺名的出现与历史上中原地区向福建移民而产生的文化影响有关。更多还原

【Abstract】 Talking about Fujian Shaolin Temple, after the propose the Quanzhou Shaolin in the 1980 s, Putian Shaolin and Fuqing Shaolin hypothesis also emerged, with the construction of temples which try to prove their existence in the past. At the same time, wushu competition, forum, publication on the renowned people and summer camp related to south Shaolin also emerged. In August 2012, digital medias such as Quanzhou Newspaper published the discovery of Yongchun Shaolin Temple, which makes the the topics of "where is the origin of south Shaolin in Fujian" more mysterious. This paper analyzes the literature concerning Fuqing Shaolin, Quanzhou Shaolin and other papers related to south Shaolin, and explores its historical origin from the aspect of "immigration thesis", and gives the conclusion that the emergence of Fuqing and Yongchun Shaolin Temple is highly related to the immigration of citizens from central plains to Fujian in history.更多还原