节点文献

水果中测定β-胡萝卜素的皂化及直接提取方法比较

COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF Β-CAROTENE IN FRUITS BY SAPONIFICATION AND DIRECT EXTRACTION

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 郑仁锦林守二陈宏靖林麒杨艳华永有

【Author】 ZHENG Ren-jin;LIN Shou-er;CHEN Hong-jing;LIN Qi;YANG Yan;HUA Yong-you;Fujian Center for Disease Control﹠Prevention, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Zoonosis;

【通讯作者】 华永有;

【机构】 福建省疾病预防控制中心理化检验科福建省人兽共患病研究重点实验室福建医科大学公卫学院教学基地

【摘要】 目的研究比较皂化法和直接提取法两种不同前处理方法测定水果中β-胡萝卜素含量。方法以福建省30种本地水果为检测对象,采用优化后的直接提取法和皂化法测定β-胡萝卜素含量,分析比较二者的测定结果及可操作性等。结果皂化法的平均回收率为93.1%~96.2%,相对标准偏差为6.9%~8.4%;直接提取法的平均回收率为73.2%~80.4%,相对标准偏差为2.8%~4.2%。皂化法的平均回收率高于直接提取法。两种方法所测定大部分水果的含量结果有明显的统计学差异(P<0.001),建阳桔柚等4种柑橘类水果含量测定结果相差不大(P>0.05)。结论水果的β-胡萝卜素含量测定中,虽然皂化法实验操作稍微繁杂、耗时,但其测定结果较为准确。

【Abstract】 Objective To compare saponification and direct extraction in determining β-carotene content in fruits. Methods Thirty kinds of native fruits in Fujian province were used as test samples. β-carotene content was determined by optimized direct extraction method or saponification method, and the results of analysis were compared. Results The average recoveries by saponification were from 93.1% to 96.2% with RSDs from 6.9% to 8.4%. The average recoveries by direct extraction were from 73.2% to 80.4% with RSDs from 2.8% to 4.2%. The average recovery rate of saponification method was higher than that of the direct extraction method. The concentrations of β-carotene in Jianyang orange grapefruits measured by the two methods were similar(P>0.05), but most other fruits showed significant statistical difference in β-carotene content(P<0.001). Conclusion Although the saponification method is a little complicated and time-consuming, it is more accurate in determining the content of β-carotene in fruits.

【关键词】 β-胡萝卜素水果皂化法直接提取法
【Key words】 β-carotenefruitssaponificationdirect extraction
【基金】 福建省自然科学基金(No.2015J01295)
  • 【文献出处】 营养学报 ,Acta Nutrimenta Sinica , 编辑部邮箱 ,2018年06期
  • 【分类号】R155.5
  • 【下载频次】404
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络