节点文献
传统疝修补术与无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床对比研究
The clinical contrast study of the tension-free hernioplasty and the traditional hernioplasty
【摘要】 目的评价传统疝修补术与无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床治疗效果。方法 2013年7月-2016年7月收治的成人腹股沟疝患者共有175例,其中施行无张力修补术119例,进行传统疝修补术56例。对手术时间、术后疼痛、疝复发、血肿、血清肿、慢性疼痛、生殖系统并发症等及其他相关并发症进行观察、总结及数据分析。结果无死亡病例。术后平均随访,综合各方面的研究结果,无张力疝修补术组在术后疼痛、疝复发、血肿、慢性疼痛以及其他并发症方面均优于传统的疝修补术组。结论无张力疝修补术术后病人疼痛少,复发率低,各项并发症少,在临床的效果上优于传统的疝修补术。
【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the treatment efficacy between the tension-free hernioplasty and the traditional hernioplasty.Methods From July 2013 to July 2016 all the 175 cases, included 119 patients carried out the tension-free hernioplasty, and 56 patients carried out the traditional hernioplasty. The operation procedure, postoperative pain, recurrency rate and other complications were studied and analyzed. Results There was no dead case. Comprehensive all of the research results, the group of the tension-free hernioplasty were superior to the traditional hernioplasty group in postoperative pain, hernia relapse, hematoma, chronic pain and other complications.Conclusion The postoperative pain of the tension-free hernioplasty was low, and has lower recurrence rate, fewer complications. The clinical effect is superior to traditional hernia repair.
- 【文献出处】 新疆医学 ,Xinjiang Medical Journal , 编辑部邮箱 ,2018年04期
- 【分类号】R656.21
- 【被引频次】5
- 【下载频次】19