【摘要】 马正平教授的"非构思写作学"值得充分肯定的贡献表现在:颠覆传统写作学的定势思维,成为写作学教学改革的急先锋,丰富了写作学学科理论建设体系和建设资源。不过,作为一种学术探讨,"非构思写作学"还存在不少疑点,甚至可以说就是硬伤,需要商榷,诸如过度强调"非构思",不免失之偏颇;强调"非构思"理念的同时,须知写作中理性处理要素的不可或缺;当心把人的写作模式置换成了机器人的写作模式。这些都有以偏概全的嫌疑。更多还原

【Abstract】 Although "non-conceived writing" promoted by Professor Ma Zhengping exits some doubts, at least the following views should be worthy of being affirmed:It is necessary to subvert the stereotyped thinking of traditional writing; 2.He becomes a pioneer in the teaching reform of writing; and it enriches the theoretical construction system of writing rules or resources. However, as a kind of academic researches, many doubts still exits in "non-conceived writing", or even it has a lot of obvious mistakes. Such views may be discussed as:First,Excessive emphasis on "non-convinced" will inevitably be biased. Sreond,While he emphasizes the "non-convinced" concepts, we should know that writing and rational processing elements are indispensable. Third,We should be careful when human writing mode has been replaced by the robots’ writing mode. Fourth,Overgeneralization is an academic taboo.更多还原