节点文献

历史对比视角下美国对华“301调查”的博弈分析

The Game Theory Analysis on US’s “301 Investigation” towards China from a Perspective of Historical Comparative

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 周金凯孙娜

【Author】 ZHOU Jin-kai;SUN Na;University of International Business and Economics;Beijing Youth Politics College;

【机构】 对外经济贸易大学中国WTO研究院北京青年政治学院

【摘要】 2017年8月,特朗普政府宣布对中国发起"301调查",中美经贸关系再次面临严峻考验。为了分析此次调查的未来走向,本文构建了基于历史对比与博弈论"两位一体"的分析框架。首先,通过历史对比分析,对历次美国对华"301调查"的背景、过程以及结果进行剖析,探讨历次"301调查"的实质和共通性。以此为基础,进而运用博弈论模型分析特朗普政府对华"301调查"最有可能的解决方式,包括双边磋商或诉诸多边贸易规则解决。最后,针对本文结论提出应对策略。

【Abstract】 On August 18, 2017, the office of the U.S. trade representative announced to initiate 301 investigation towards China. In order to predict the trend of 301 investigation, the paper tries to analyze the "301 investigation" towards China by using the method of historical comparison, and concluded that all the 301 investigation were resolved in the form of negotiation although each one has its own background and process. Then, the paper analyzes the realistic rationality of the negotiation between China and the United States in the "301 investigation" with game theory, and predicts that the solution of 301 investigation in 2017 will eventually be resolved by negotiation or resort to WTO dispute settlement procedure. Finally, the paper puts forward the policy suggestions from negotiation, retaliation and WTO framework.

【关键词】 “301调查”特朗普贸易战博弈论WTO
【Key words】 301 investigationTrumptrade wargame theoryWTO
【基金】 国家社会科学基金一般项目“美国对华337调查案例及对策研究”(项目编号:16BFX208)资助
  • 【文献出处】 上海对外经贸大学学报 ,Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics , 编辑部邮箱 ,2018年04期
  • 【分类号】F224.32;F752.7;F757.12
  • 【被引频次】34
  • 【下载频次】2288
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络