【摘要】 专家组打分能克服单一专家的片面性,但专家组判定必须满足一致性的要求。利用Spearman对专家组指标排序作一致性检验,通过循环修正,得到了统一的指标,对这些指标的重要程度进行排序;在遵守排序结果的前提下,结合专家组打分的平均值来初步确定权重,再以专家组对同一指标重要程度判定的一致性的大小来修正权重,从而建立了彭山区水资源利用率的综合评价模型并将其应用于实际评价。结果表明,评价结果与实际调查结果基本吻合,证明了该方法的合理性。更多还原

【Abstract】 One-sided problem using single expert for decision-making can be overcome by panel scoring,however a common conclusion needs to be achieved by panel experts. In the water resources utilization evaluation,Spearman is used to perform consistency test on the index rankings; cyclic corrections result in a unified index,and indexes are ranked according to their importance. Under the premise of abiding the rankings,the weights are initially determined according to the average scores given by panel experts,and then corrections were made to the weights according to the consistency value of the same index’s importance that is given by the panel expert,so a comprehensive model is built to assess the water resources utilization coefficient in Pengshan district. The assessed results are in line with the actual investigation results,which proves its rationality.更多还原