节点文献

生理学期末考试成绩及主观试题质量分析

Test Scores and Subjective Questions Analysis of Quality of the Final Test Paper for Physiology

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张彩彩胡爱华王晗王杨翁启芳梁平董战玲

【Author】 ZHANG Caicai;HU Aihua;WANG Han;WANG Yang;WENG Qifang;LIANG Ping;DONG Zhanling;Teaching and Research Room of Physiology, Hainan Medical College;Laboratory of Morphology, Hainan Medical College;

【通讯作者】 董战玲;

【机构】 海南医学院生理学教研室海南医学院形态学实验室

【摘要】 目的对本科生《生理学》期末考试成绩及试题质量进行客观评价,发现教学过程中的薄弱环节以及存在的问题,进而提高教学质量和改善教学效果。方法回顾性分析我校2013年9月—2017年9月五年制(2012~2016级)全体本科学生生理学期末考试成绩和试卷的主观试题。结果分析显示试卷题型全面,试题难度适中,成绩分布较为合理,学生的学业水平能用学生的考分真实的反应出来。但学习成绩优秀学生与成绩差学生存在差距较大。结论教师在今后的教学设计中,应加强对学习成绩差学生的帮助,缩小差距。

【Abstract】 Objective The final examination results and test questions quality of Physiology for undergraduates are evaluated to find out the weak links and existing problems in the teaching process, and then improve the teaching quality and teaching effect. Methods This paper analyzes the results of the final physiology exam and the subjective test questions of all undergraduate students in the five-year system from September 2013 to September 2017(grades 2012 to 2016). Results The analysis shows that the test questions are comprehensive, the difficulty of the test questions is moderate, the score distribution is more reasonable, and the students’ academic level can be reflected by the students’ scores. But there is a big gap between the students with outstanding academic achievements and those with poor grades. Conclusion In the future teaching design, teachers should strengthen the help to students with poor academic performance andnarrow the gap.

【基金】 海南省高等学校教育教学改革研究项目(Hnjg2015-47)
  • 【文献出处】 中国继续医学教育 ,China Continuing Medical Education , 编辑部邮箱 ,2018年30期
  • 【分类号】R-4;G642
  • 【被引频次】7
  • 【下载频次】307
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络