节点文献

有轨运输改无轨运输方案比选——以新凉风垭隧道瓦斯突出为例

Rail Transport or Non-rail Transport:A Case Study of the Liangfengya Coal-gas Tunnel

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 王明慧曹美俊凌飞翔倪少权罗加明张桥

【Author】 WANG Ming-hui;CAO Mei-jun;LING Fei-xiang;NI Shao-quan;LUO Jia-ming;ZHANG Qiao;Chongqing-Wanzhou Railway Co., Ltd;School of transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University;School of Economics, Southwest University of Political Science and Law;Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd, China Railway 18th Bureau Group Co., Ltd;Chengdu Supervision and Administration bureau,National Railway Administration of the People’s Republic of China;

【机构】 渝黔铁路有限责任公司西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院西南政法大学经济学院中铁十八局集团有限公司隧道工程公司国家铁路局成都监管局

【摘要】 渝黔铁路新凉风垭隧道煤层瓦斯浓度高并具有突出风险,为I级高风险隧道,该隧道原设计采用有轨运输,其工序较复杂,场地要求大,成本投入高,运输组织难。本文主要阐述煤层瓦斯隧道施工原则,论证瓦斯突出隧道无轨运输方案的可行性,深入进行有轨运输改无轨运输方案的分析比较。结果表明,无轨运输优于有轨运输,为今后类似瓦斯突出隧道施工提供有益的借鉴与参考。

【Abstract】 The liangfengya tunnel of Chongqing-Guizhou railway has a high level of coal-gas concentration and it is identified as an I-class high-risk tunnel. The original design of the tunnel is by rail transport, which requires more complicated construction process, larger space, higher cost, and also causes difficulties in transportation organization.The paper illustrates the construction principle of the coal-gas tunnel, demonstrates the feasibility of a non-rail transportation plan, and proposes a thorough modification from rail transport to non-rail transport.The analysis indicates that the non-rail transport plan out performs the rail transport plan. The findings of the study can offer useful references to the construction of similar coal-gas tunnels.

【基金】 国家自然基金项目(61403317,61703351);国家重点研发计划资助(2017YFB1200700,2016YFC0802208);中国铁路总公司科技研究计划项目(2016X006-D);四川省科技计划项目(2017ZR0149,2017RZ0007);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2682017ZDPY04,2682017CX022,2682017CX018)
  • 【文献出处】 交通运输工程与信息学报 ,Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information , 编辑部邮箱 ,2018年01期
  • 【分类号】U455.4
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】81
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络