【摘要】 当前关于目击证人辨认的研究成果看似零散无序,却大致可以用两个科学原理(期望效应和相对判断)予以解释。这些研究成果不仅质量上乘,还在很多方面都达成了很高程度的共识。根据这些共识,为了使辨认结果更为可靠,辨认应采用双盲程序,应避免不适当地突出嫌疑人,应在辨前告知目击证人"罪犯可能不在被辨认者之中"、"无论是否指认出罪犯,侦查都会继续进行下去",辨认笔录的记载应更为全面,辨认过程应录音录像,辩护律师应有权在辨认过程中在场。我国的规则制定者和司法实务人员应熟悉已有研究成果,并根据已有扎实科学基础的研究结论完善我国立法和司法实践。更多还原

【Abstract】 Although the scientific research results on eyewitness identification seem to be scattered and unorganized, they can be explained by two scientific principles: Expectancy Effect and Relative Judgment.These high quality scientific researches reach consensus in many aspects of eyewitness identification.According to the consensus, double-blind procedure should be employed; suspect should not unduly stand out from among other fillers; lineup administrator should tell witness that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup; and that the investigation will continue regardless of the lineup result; identification procedures should be written down comprehensively and videotaped; defense attorney should be allowed to be present in the identification procedures. Rule-makers and law enforcement officers should be familiar with these scientific research results, and improve the legislative and judicial practice based on these research results.更多还原