【摘要】 目的:比较急诊科Lucas2心肺复苏仪器与徒手方式实施心肺复苏的临床效果。方法:回顾需要行心肺复苏治疗的患者72例,其中对照组(n=42)采用徒手心肺复苏法,观察组(n=30)采用Lucas2心肺复苏仪器,分析比较两组临床效果。结果:主循环恢复(ROSC)、CPR成功率、存活率观察组分别为20.0%、10%、6.7%,对照组分别为11.9%、4.8%、2.4%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组自主心跳、循环、呼吸及血压恢复时间均明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相较于徒手心肺复苏,Lucas2心肺复苏仪器心肺复苏效果更好且成功率更高,更值得推广。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To compare the clinical effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with Lucas2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation instrument and unarmed approach. Method Retrospectively were treated in the Emergency Department required cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the treatment of 72 cases of which manual CPR was used,the control group( n = 42) was treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation,and the observation group( n = 30) was treated with Lucas2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation instrument,analysis and comparison of clinical effect of the two group. Results The recovery rate of spontaneous circulation in the observation group was 20. 0%,the success rate of CPR was 10%,the survival rate was 6. 7%,comparison of the control group( 11. 9%,4. 8% and 2. 4%) there was no significant difference( P > 0. 05). The time of recovery,circulation,respiration and blood pressure recovery in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group( P < 0. 05). Conclusion Lucas2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation is better and more successful than cardiopulmonary resuscitation.更多还原