节点文献

五个国家助产专业的管理与教育的比较(英文)

A review and comparison of midwifery management and education in five representative countries

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 周楠陆虹

【Author】 Nan Zhou;Hong Lu;School of Nursing, Peking University;

【通讯作者】 陆虹;

【机构】 School of Nursing, Peking University

【摘要】 助产士在保障母婴健康方面发挥着重要作用,然而我国目前还缺乏对助产士的规范化和系统化管理。本文回顾和比较了分布在北美洲、欧洲、大洋洲的5个代表性国家助产管理与教育现状。基于这些国家的经验,我国应该继续探索和发展助产高等教育,形成独立的助产士职称体系,规范助产士认证和管理,建立优质的助产环境,以提升职业吸引力。

【Abstract】 Midwives play an important role in guaranteeing mothers and babies’ good health. However, standardisation and systematic management of midwifery are insufficient in China. This study reviews and compares the present situation of midwifery management and education in five representative countries located in North America, Europe and Oceania. Based on the experience of these countries, Midwifery development in China should continue to explore and develop midwifery university education, form a midwife professional title system, standardize midwife certification and management. And a quality midwifery environment should be created in order to enhance career attractiveness.

【关键词】 教育人员管理助产士
【Key words】 EducationPersonnel managementMidwives
  • 【文献出处】 International Journal of Nursing Sciences ,国际护理科学(英文) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2018年01期
  • 【分类号】R47-4;G642
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络