节点文献

高校“三位一体”综合评价录取质量与公平的个案研究

Quality and Equity: A Case Study of the “Trinity” Evaluation and Enrollment in Higher Education Institutions

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 李云星姜洪友卢程佳陈天云张振良楼英伟李伟建

【Author】 LI Yunxing;JIANG Hongyou;LU Chengjia;CHEN Tianyun;ZHANG Zhenliang;LOU Yingwei;LI Weijian;College of Teacher Education,Zhejiang Normal University;Student Affairs Department,Zhejiang Normal University;Undergraduate Teaching Department,Zhejiang Normal University;

【机构】 浙江师范大学教师教育学院浙江师范大学学生处浙江师范大学本科教学部

【摘要】 本研究聚焦高校招录的质量与公平问题,以浙江师范大学为研究对象,比较了"三位一体"综合评价录取学生和同专业普通高考浙江省内招录学生的各项表现。研究发现,尽管存在专业和年度差异,高考成绩全面落后的"三位一体"综合评价录取学生却在专业认同、平均学分绩点、党组织与学生组织参与、获奖、竞赛、荣誉等方面整体优于参照群体。数据还显示,"三位一体"综合评价录取更有利于城镇生源学生脱颖而出。高校"三位一体"综合评价录取应进一步明确定位、提升科学性并审慎看待、解决其公平问题。

【Abstract】 Focusing on quality and equityin admission,the paper takes Zhejiang Normal University as the research object and compares the performances of the students enrolled through " Trinity" Comprehensive Evaluation in the college entrance examination. The findings show that,despite the gaps between programs and grades,the performance of students enrolled through "Trinity"Evaluation as a whole is better than the reference group in terms of program identity,GPA,participation in the Party and student unions,as well as awards and honors. The data also reveal that "Trinity"Comprehensive Evaluation and enrollment are more favorable to urban students. The paper concludes that "Trinity " Comprehensive Evaluation and enrollment should be employed more cautiously and improved.

【基金】 国家社科基金教育学重大招标课题“适应新高考要求的普通高中学业水平考试与综合素质评价实施策略研究”(VHA150003)
  • 【文献出处】 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ,Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2018年03期
  • 【分类号】G647.32
  • 【被引频次】18
  • 【下载频次】1402
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络