节点文献

胸腔镜与常规开胸手术治疗食管癌的效果分析

Effect Analysis of Thoracoscopy and Conventional Thoracotomy in Treatment of Patients with Esophageal Cancer

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 蒋锋王伟王强姜敏炎

【Author】 JIANG Feng;WANG Wei;WANG Qiang;JIANG Min-yan;Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,Changzhou Wujin People’s Hospital;Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical College;

【通讯作者】 王伟;

【机构】 常州市武进人民医院胸心外科南京医科大学第一附属医院胸外科

【摘要】 目的分析并比较胸腔镜与常规开胸三切口治疗食管癌的效果。方法选取2007年1月—2014年6月常州市武进人民医院胸外科行手术治疗的食管癌127例,按手术方式分为开胸手术组(58例)和胸腔镜手术组(69例)。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后恢复速度、并发症发生率及3年预后的差异。结果胸腔镜组手术用时长于开胸手术组,但术中出血量和术后第1 d引流量少于开胸手术组(P<0.05);2组术中淋巴结清除量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。胸腔镜组术后拔除引流管时间和术后出院均早于开胸手术组(P<0.05)。2组术后ICU转入率和病死率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。胸腔镜组呼吸系统并发症发生率及并发症总发生率均少于开胸手术组(P<0.05)。2组术后1、3年生存率、复发率及远处转移率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论胸腔镜和常规开放手术比较并不能明显提高患者生存率,但胸腔镜可减少术中损伤,促进恢复,降低患者呼吸系统并发症。

【Abstract】 Objective To analyze and compare effect between thoracoscopy and conventional three-incisions thoracotomy in treatment of patients with esophageal cancer. Methods A total of 127 esophageal cancer patients with surgical treatment admitted during January 2007 and June 2014 were divided into thoracotomy group( n = 58) and thoracoscopy group( n = 69) according to surgical methods. Operative time,intraoperative bleeding volume,postoperative draining volume,postoperative recovery speed,incidence rate of complications and prognosis within 3 years were compared between two groups. Results In thoracoscopy group,operative time was longer,while intraoperative bleeding volume and draining volume at 1 std after surgery were less than those in thoracotomy group( P < 0. 05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative clearance volume of lymph nodes between two groups( P > 0. 05). Postoperative extraction of drainage tube and time of discharge times in thoracoscopy group were earlier than those in thoracotomy group( P <0. 05). There were no significant differences in ICU transferring rate and fatality rate between two groups( P > 0. 05).Incidence rates of respiratory complications and the total incidence of complications in thoracoscopy group were less than those in thoracotomy group( P < 0. 05). There were no significant differences in survival,recurrence and distant metastasis rates in 1 year and 3 years after surgery between two groups( P > 0. 05). Conclusion Thoracoscopy can not significantly increase survival rate of patients compared with that by conventional open surgery,but it may reduce intraoperative injuries,accelerate recovery and reduce incidence rate of respiratory complications.

【基金】 江苏省科学技术发展研究项目(BK20151175)
  • 【文献出处】 解放军医药杂志 ,Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army , 编辑部邮箱 ,2018年08期
  • 【分类号】R735.1
  • 【被引频次】13
  • 【下载频次】63
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络