【摘要】 《史记》反映出汉初存在父称子为"公"、师称生为"公"的两种特殊现象,其中《袁盎晁错列传》、《郦生陆贾列传》中的材料可以支持汉初存在父称子为"公"的现象,而《刘敬叔孙通列传》中的材料无法支撑汉初存在师称生为"公"的现象,补以《扁鹊仓公列传》证明之。父称子为"公"是由父亲愤懑和戏谑的消极情绪造成的,而老师称呼学生为"公"则是对于学生才华的肯定。造成这两种特殊现象的原因在于血缘等级的天然合法性,而这两种特殊现象的基础在于"公"称谓尊称性质的广泛性。更多还原

【Abstract】 Shiji reflects the two special phenomena of the father’s calling his son"Gong"and the teacher calling the students"Gong".The material of the Biography of Lu Sheng and Li Jia can support the phenomenon that the father calls his son Gong" in the Han Dynasty,and the material of in the Biography of Liu Jing and Shu Suntong can not support the phenomenon that the teacher call the student" Gong" in the Han Dynasty,and make up with the Biography of Bian Que and Cang Gong.It His father called his son" Gong" is caused by the resentment of his father’s negative emotions,while the teacher called the student" Gong" is affirmed for the students’ talent.At the same time,the dissertation points out that the reason for these two special phenomena lies in the natural legitimacy of blood rank.The basis for the appearance of these two special phenomena lies in the breadth of the nature of the title of" Gong" title.更多还原