【摘要】 "性骚扰"在公共空间日益被建构为紧迫的社会问题,而从公共讨论转化为政策实践却是充满不确定性、既有文献鲜有讨论的过程。文章从"比较女性主义政策"的基本视野、研究问题和理论张力出发来比较美国和欧洲反性骚扰政策的两个面向:政策话语的机会结构、话语策略以及非意料后果;政策过程中由国家权力结构塑造的"进入点"、参与政策制定的行为主体等。以此为镜鉴,文章先提出中国高校短期可行的性骚扰防范机制,再探讨了未来在全国范围内应"延伸"《妇女权益保障法》,通过行政-立法途径,利用妇联的枢纽作用,联合各方行动主体共同推进政策制定。更多还原

【Abstract】 Although"sexual harassment"has increasingly been constructed as a pressing social problem in the public sphere,the more critical,yet precarious process of transforming public debate into policy were generally understudied. Drawing on the comparative perspective,research questions and theoretical deliberation of "Feminist Comparative Policies",this paper compares anti-sexual harassment policies in US and European Union in two essential aspects i. e.,discursive construction( opportunity structure,discursive strategy and unintended consequences) and policy-making process( access point,agents). Last but not the least,it is suggested that in the short run,Chinese universities take feasible preventions and build professional committees; in the long run,China can"stretch"the previous Women’s Rights Protection Law,follow the adminstrative-legislative path and moblize the Women’s Federation as a nodal agent.更多还原