【摘要】 互联网络技术的发展,为知识产权保护带来了一系列挑战。在著作权领域,我国《信息网络传播权保护条例》规定了"通知删除"的制度,《侵权责任法》第36条也针对网络上的民事侵权行为规定了"通知删除"的制度。在"嘉易烤公司诉金仕德公司和天猫公司"一案中,浙江省高级人民法院探讨了专利侵权领域中的"通知删除"问题,认为被告天猫公司在接到原告的他人侵犯自己专利权的通知后,没有及时采取删除、屏蔽的措施,应当承担连带责任。然而,专利侵权的认定不同于著作权侵权的认定,提供服务的互联网络公司没有判定相关商品侵权与否的能力。与此相应,是否应当将"通知删除"制度延伸到专利侵权领域,就是一个值得进一步探讨的问题。更多还原

【Abstract】 The development of the internet has brought many challenges for the protection of intellectual property rights. In the copyright protection, the Regulations for the Protection of Copyright in the Information Network provides a rule of "notice and take down", and Article 36 of the Law of Tort as well provides the rule of "notice and take down" for torts. In "Jiayi Kao v. Jinshi De and Tianmao" case, the high court of Zhejiang province discussed the rule of "notice and take down" in the field of patent infringement, and held that defendant Tianmao should be responsible for the infringement of patent by another defendant Jinshi De as a joint tortfeasor. However, the rule of "notice and take down" is resulted from the copyright infringement in the internet, whether or not it can be applied in the field of patent infringement in the internet is a question that shall be discussed further.更多还原