【摘要】 本文对甲柏连孜所著《汉文经纬》(甲著)和马建忠所著《马氏文通》(马著)做了初步的比较,发现二书在学理逻辑上都能以现代科学理性形而上的思想方法研究汉语语法,在汉语词类划分上都以词为本位,恪守汉语"词有定类"的规律。马著列述词类"假借"即活用说,甲著用语义语法手段并修辞法,含不定式、分词说等消解之,可在两著的学理逻辑形而上和各自的语法思想上找到答案。更多还原

【Abstract】 A comparison between Chinesische Grammatik( Mapping the Grammar of the Chinese Language) and Mashi Wentong( Ma’s Grammar of the Chinese Language) indicates that both resorted to the metaphysical research methodology characteristic of modern science for their logic of rationality in investigating the grammar of classical Chinese. Ma enumerated borrowings across different classes of ci( word), while Gabelentz sought to resolve the perplexities of the classification of Chinese ci through an integration of semanticgrammatical and rhetorical perspectives, and illustrations of such notions as the indefinite and the participle. The rationale for the contrast resides in the two scholars’ views of and metaphysical logic approaches to Chinese grammar.更多还原