节点文献
两种评定营养不良方法的对比研究
The comparison of two methods to evaluate malnutrition
【摘要】 目的运用两种评定营养不良方法对比胃癌、结肠癌、直肠癌、肠梗阻患者的营养不良发生率。方法对住院患者进行定点连续采样,分别采用BMI<18.5kg/m2及NRS2002营养风险筛查工具中营养受损部分评分大于或等于3分评定营养不良,进而对比其发生率。结果获得符合标准226例患者。使用BMI评定营养不良发生率(11.06%)低于使用NRS2002营养风险筛查工具中营养受损部分评定营养不良发生率(14.60%)。调查科室的营养支持情况结果发现合乎规范的营养支持占7.96%,不规范的营养支持占17.26%,极不规范营养支持占5.31%。结论使用NRS2002营养受损部分判断营养不良的方法值得推广。
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the incidence of malnutrition in patients with stomach cancer,intestinal obstruction,colon and rectal cancer by using two assessments.Methods Inpatients were consecutively recorded,to diagnose malnutrition,one way was using BMI<18.5 kg/m2,another one was three variablesweight loss of NRS2002,and then compare its incidence.Results A total of 226 patients were recruited.Malnutrition rate which was 11.06% by using BMI,was lower than that using NRS2002(14.60%).Patients who accepted adequate nutrition support was 7.96%,no-adequate nutrition support was 17.26%,and extremely no-adequate nutrition support accounted for 5.31%.Conclusion Adopting NRS2002 to diagnose malnutrition is worthy to promote.
【Key words】 malnutrition; nutritional support; nutritional risk tool 2002;
- 【文献出处】 重庆医学 ,Chongqing Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2018年13期
- 【分类号】R591
- 【被引频次】5
- 【下载频次】126