节点文献

同行评议造假原因分析及防范措施

Analysis of causes for fraud peer review and precautionary measures

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 彭芳; 金建华; 董燕萍;

【Author】 PENG Fang;JIN Jianhua;DONG Yanping;Academic Journal Publishing,the First Affiliated Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine;

【机构】 浙江大学医学院附属第一医院期刊中心;

【摘要】 同行评议是确保学术成果在评价中具有公正性和有效性的一项制度。近几年,频繁出现的同行评议造假行为使研究人员乃至整个社会的科研诚信受到质疑。然而,同行评议造假涉及多个环节,本文将从评审专家、编辑、作者以及审稿制度等方面出发,分析同行评议存在的问题及可行的防范措施,以促进学术期刊健康、有序发展。

【Abstract】 Peer review system has been used to ensure that academic results are impartial and effective in evaluation. In recent years, fraud peer review has appeared frequently and made researchers,even the whole society’s research integrity subjected into doubt. However,peer review frauds involve many parties,such as peer reviewers,editors,authors as well as the reviewing system. In this paper,the author analyzes the problems existing in peer review and summarizes the feasible measures to promote the healthy and orderly development of academic journals.

  • 【分类号】G237.5
  • 【被引频次】19
  • 【下载频次】464
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络