节点文献

收入分配视角的住房保障方式选择:国际经验与借鉴

The Choice of Housing Security Mode from the Perspective of Income Distribution: International Experience and Reference

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 陈伟

【Author】 CHEN Wei;School of Marxism,Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications;

【机构】 北京邮电大学马克思主义学院

【摘要】 住房保障可以分为供给方补贴和需求方补贴两种方式。回顾西方国家住房保障制度的发展历程,早期均以供给方补贴为主,而后逐渐转向需求方补贴,两种住房保障方式对改善收入分配均有重要作用,但政策缘由和实施效果又有明显不同。现阶段,为了更好发挥住房保障的收入分配作用,我国应主要采取供给方补贴方式,不宜过分否定"产权出售"的住房保障形式,可以根据保障对象的收入水平灵活适用不同的住房保障方式。

【Abstract】 Housing security can be divided into two modes: supply-side subsidy and demand-side subsidy. In thedevelopment of housing security system in western countries,supply-side subsidy was primarily adopted in the early stages,for which demand-side subsidy gradually substituted. Both two modes are effective in optimizing income distribution,buttheir political reasons and the effect of implementation were obviously different. Nowadays,subsidy-side supply should be theprincipal mode in our country in order to fully exert the effect of housing security on income distribution. It is inappropriateto completely deny the housing security form of"property right sale". Different housing security modes can be appliedflexibly in concordance with the income level of the insured.

【基金】 教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目“适度住房保障水平与缩小收入分配差距的关系研究”(13YJC630011)
  • 【文献出处】 安徽行政学院学报 ,Journal of Anhui Administration Institute , 编辑部邮箱 ,2018年06期
  • 【分类号】F299.23
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】226
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络