【摘要】 20世纪上半叶,中国学术进入转型和发展时期,其中新考据学派占据当时学界的主流地位,贡献尤大。此派治学重视材料、注重考据,无征不信,主张"小题大做"及在博通的基础上做专精研究,提倡建设实证史学,反对空论和疏通。而史观学派则强调史观和理论,以理论统领史实,注重探寻历史规律,倡导史学为现实政治服务,反对做琐碎的考据。因新考据学派的治学取向、宗旨与史观学派有较大差异,以致二者对立明显、交集不多,并互有批评,前者批评后者不重史实的史学是无根之飘萍,后者批评前者的工作只是整理考订史料,无法贯通和解释历史。这其中的是非得失值得今日治史者深思。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the first half of the 20 th century,China’s academic went into the transition and development period,and the New Textual Criticism School occupied the core position of the academic community. This school attaches great importance to the material,pays attention to textual research and advocates " making a fuss over a trifle",tends to carry out specific research based on extensive analysis. On the contrary,the School of History does not stand for trivial textual research,and tends to emphasizethe historical view and theory,command historical facts by theory,explore the rules of history,and use history to serve politics. These sharp differences between the two schools in terms of study orientation and aim have led to theirfierce confrontation and little intersection as well as mutual criticism,which is worthy of deep thought of currents historians.更多还原