【摘要】 历史学家要纳入自身的历史解释的,总是在他看来重要的、有意义的历史事实。历史事实并非没有自身内在的重要性,但其重要性也绝非一成不变,而总是随着史学和史家关照的问题的变化、价值观的转换而发生变化和转换的。未必具备历史的重要性的历史事实,却完全可能具备史学上的重要性,从而在历史解释中占据一席之地。由于历史事实要经过历史学家的"拣选"、并以语言结构的形式进入历史学图景,因此,历史事实和历史解释之间并没有截然分明的分界线。史料制约着历史解释的范围,历史解释却也有其具有弹性和不确定性的一面。历史解释离不开问题意识和理论自觉,历史学应当在接纳与汲取各门学科的理论资源和研究方法的同时,又对其有效性范围保持警醒。更多还原

【Abstract】 The historical facts included by historians in their interpretation are always those they think are important and significant.Historical facts,without doubt,have inherent significance of their own.However,the degree of their importance is not constant;rather,they keep changing along with the shift of value and focus of historians.Historical facts that are not necessarily significant in history can be valuable in historical research,and therefore hold a place in historical interpretations.Since historical facts are subject to the selection historians who picture them in language,there is no clear boundary between historical facts and historical interpretations.The limits of historical interpretations are restricted by historical materials;on the other hand however,historical interpretations can be subjective and inconstant.Historical interpretations are closely related to issue consciousness and theoretical awareness.Historical study should keep vigilant about the limits of its validity while absorbing theoretical sources and methods from other disciplines.更多还原