【摘要】 为研究层次分析法在兜兰的综合评价中的应用,以12个兜兰种作为供试材料,采用层次分析法对其进行综合评价,兜兰的层次分析模型分为目标层(综合评价)、约束层(株形、花、叶)、标准层(分株数、株高、冠幅、花色、花径、花期、花葶、叶色、叶长、叶宽、叶量)。在约束层中,花所占的权重最大,其次是叶。在花的标准层中,花径所占的权重值最大,其次是花色和花期。在叶的标准层中,叶量所占的权重值最大,其次是叶色。12个兜兰种的综合评价结果表明,试材可分为3个等级,其中菲律宾兜兰、虎斑兜兰、带叶兜兰、紫纹兜兰、长瓣兜兰、亨利兜兰、麻栗坡兜兰综合评价得分较高,在实际生产中可将其作为首选种。更多还原

【Abstract】 To comprehensively evaluate Paphiopedilum, this paper used analytic hierarchy process to appraise12 Paphiopedilum species. The analytic hierarchy process model established for Paphiopedilum evaluationincluded goal level, restraint layer, and marker bed. The goal level included the comprehensive assessment ofPaphiopedilum. The restraint layer referred to plant shape, flower and leaf. The marker bed contained branchnumber, plant height, crown breadth, flower color, flower diameter, florescence, scape, leaf color, leaf length,leaf width, and the number of leaf. In the restraint layer, flower had the biggest weight, the next was leaf. In themarker bed of flower, flower diameter had the biggest weight, followed by flower color and florescence. In themarker bed of leaf, the number of leaf had the biggest weight, followed by leaf color. By the AHP, 12 Paphiopedilum species could be classified 3 grades. The comprehensive scores of P. philippinense, P.tigrinum, P. hirsutissimum, P. purpuratum, P. dianthum, P. henryanum, P. malipoense were the best, and werethe first choice in actual production process.更多还原