节点文献

18F-FDG PET/CT、99mTc-MDP全身骨显像及其联合CT对肺癌骨转移的诊断价值比较

Comparison of the diagnosis value of 18F-FDG PET/CT with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy or bone scintigraphy combined CT in the detection of bone metastases of lung cancer

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 周建明毛朝明朱丽高健青殷瑞根张礼荣赵亮孔倩倩李林

【Author】 ZHOU Jianming;MAO Chaoming;ZHANG Lirong;ZHU Li;GAO Jianqing;YIM Ruigen;ZHAO Liang;KOMG Qian-qian;LI Lin;Department of Nuclear Medicine of Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University;Department of Radiology,Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University;

【机构】 江苏大学附属医院核医学科江苏大学附属医院影像科

【摘要】 目的探讨18F-FDG PET/CT,99mTc-MDP全身骨显像(BS)及BS联合CT这三种方法对肺癌骨转移诊断价值的比较。方法回顾性分析2014年1月2016年8月间行18F-FDG PET/CT及BS检查并经病理证实的56例肺癌患者,将BS与18F-FDG PET/CT同机CT图像进行联合诊断,以病理及临床随访为诊断依据,比较BS、BS联合CT及18F-FDG PET/CT对肺癌骨转移的诊断价值。数据分析采用χ2检验,P﹤0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果 56例患者中骨转移28例共138处骨转移灶。基于患者,18F-FDG PET/CT(96.4%及94.6%)与BS联合CT(89.3%及91.1%)诊断肺癌骨转移的特异性及准确性均高于BS(60.7%及75.0%)(均P<0.01与均P<0.05),18F-FDG PET/CT(92.9%)与BS(89.3%)灵敏度差异无统计学意义。18F-FDG PET/CT与BS联合CT之间差异均无统计学意义。基于骨转移灶,18F-FDG PET/CT对骨转移灶的检出率(92.0%)高于BS联合CT(79.0%)(X2=9.473,P<0.01),BS联合CT高于BS(68.1%)(X2=4.191,P<0.05)。18F-FDG PET/CT对CT无形态异常(骨髓转移)及溶骨性转移灶的检出率高于BS联合CT(X2=16.261及15.300,均P<0.01),BS联合CT对溶骨性转移灶的检出率高于BS(X2=6.711,P<0.01),BS对成骨性转移灶的检出率高于18F-FDG PET/CT(X2=8.892,P<0.01)。18F-FDG PET/CT更容易发现位于胸椎、骶椎、骨盆及股骨的转移灶。结论18F-FDG PET/CT与BS联合CT诊断肺癌骨转移的价值优于BS,18F-FDG PET/CT能更早发现BS联合CT无法检出的骨髓及小的溶骨性转移灶。

【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of18F-FDG PET/CT,compared with99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy or combined CT for the detection of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 56 patients( 33 men,23 women,median age 60. 0 years). All specimens conrmed by the pathology underwent both18F-FDG PET/CT and bone scintigraphy from January 2014 to August 2016. We combined BS with CT which was used for18F-FDG PET/CT and joint pathology and clinical follow-up diagnosis to compare the diagnostic value of bone scintigraphy,or combined CT with18FFDG PET/CT. Chi-square test was used for comparing results of bone metastasis by this three methods. P < 0. 05 was considered statistically significant. Results Of the 56 patients,28 patients with 138 metastatic bone lesions were diagnosed. Based on patients,the specificity and accuracy for18F-FDG PET/CT( 96. 4% and 94. 6%) and BS combined CT( 89. 3% and 91. 1%)were higher than BS( 60. 7% and 75. 0%) in diagnosisof bone metastases of lung cancer( all P < 0. 05),but the sensitivity of18F-FDG PET/CT( 92. 9%) and BS( 89. 3%) had no statistical significance. The difference between18F-FDG PET/CT and BS combined CT had no statistical significance. Based on metastatic bone lesions,the relevance ratio of bone metastases by18F-FDG PET/CT( 92. 0%) were higher than BS combined CT( 79. 0%)( X2= 9. 473,P < 0. 01). Meantime,the relevance ratio of bone metastases by BS combined CT( 79. 0%) was higher than BS( 68. 1%)( X2= 4. 191,P < 0. 05). The relevance ratio of no abnormal morphology( bone marrow metastases) and osteolytic metastases by18F-FDG PET/CT were higher than BS combined CT( X2= 16. 261 and 15. 300,P < 0. 01). The relevance ratio of osteolytic metastases by BS combined CT was higher than BS( X2=6. 711,P < 0. 01). The relevance ratio of osteoblastic metastases by BS was higher than18F-FDG PET/CT( X2= 8. 892,P <0. 01). We found18F-FDG PET/CT was easier to find metastases located in thoracic vertebra,sacralvertebra,pelvis and femur.Conclusion The diagnostic value of18F-FDG PET/CT and BS combined CT was better than BS alone for the detection of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer.18F-FDG PET/CT could earlierly find bone marrow metastases and small osteolytic metastases than BS combined CT.

  • 【文献出处】 医学影像学杂志 ,Journal of Medical Imaging , 编辑部邮箱 ,2017年10期
  • 【分类号】R730.44;R734.2
  • 【被引频次】28
  • 【下载频次】181
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络