【摘要】 德国环境团体诉讼的发展一直受制于德国传统法律理论的影响,经过不断修法后才赋予并扩大了环保团体的诉讼权能,以实现其保护环境公益的目的。在这个过程中,对保护规范理论的突破,让德国利他型环境团体诉讼从主观诉讼转向了客观诉讼。这一转变既是由于德国国内多年来环境运动和政治绿色化的压力,又是由于欧盟法转化和欧洲法院一系列判例的影响。德国的实践与中国的实践既有相同之处,具体情形又有不同。中国应当借鉴德国发展中的经验和教训,有意识地推动环境行政公益诉讼制度的完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 The traditional legal theory impacts the evolution of group litigation for environment in Germany.For the reason of environmental protection,environmental NGOs were entitled the admissibility after some amendments of laws.During the evolution,since the protective norm theory was not a shackle anymore,the nature of a group litigation for environment was changed from subjective suit to objective suit.The impetuses for this change are,on the one hand,the pressure from environmental movements and politics,and,on the other hand,the transposition of EU laws and impacts of some decisions by ECJ.Comparatively,China not only shares the same experience of Germany in its legal theory,but also has a different situation.The evolution of administrative litigation for environmental public interest would inspire the Chinese counterpart to build and improve the institutions of administrative litigation for environmental public interest in China.更多还原