节点文献

论律师职业伦理的冲突与消解

On the Conflict and Resolution of the Lawyer Profession Ethics

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 索站超

【Author】 Suo Zhanchao;Law School,Henan University;

【机构】 河南大学法学院

【摘要】 律师常常面临程序正义与实体正义之冲突、多重责任之冲突以及职业主义和商业主义之间的冲突,根源在于其自身公共性与商业性的内在冲突以及职业伦理与大众伦理的分野。由于制度安排,中国律师还面临着自治困境、忠诚困境和认同困境等特殊的职业伦理困境。除了借鉴他国对律师公共责任的强调以及制定行为示范规则外,我国还应当在律师的重新定位、职业养成与训练、职业准入制度等方面进行调整,同时增强法律职业伦理教育的实效性,从而最大限度地消解职业伦理困境,促进律师职业的健康发展。

【Abstract】 Lawyers often confront conflicts of procedural justice and substantive justice,conflicts of multiple responsibilities and conflict between the professionalism and commercialism,those are rooted in its own internal conflicts of public and commercial and the division of professional ethics and public ethics.Because of the arrangement of our system,Chinese lawyers also faced the following three special ethics dilemmas: the autonomy,loyalty and identification.In addition to learn from the experiences that succeeded in other countries,emphasis on lawyers public liability and formulate model rules of behavior,our country should adjust these systems: relocation of the lawyer profession,cultivation and training of profession and etc.at the same time,enhance the effectiveness of education about legal ethics,so as to resolve the professional ethics dilemma,promote the development of the lawyer profession healthily.

【关键词】 律师职业伦理律师责任
【Key words】 lawyerprofessional ethicslawyer’s liability
【基金】 河南省教育厅2014年人文社会科学研究项目“中国律师职业伦理:困境及其消解”阶段性成果(项目编号为:2014-QN-007)
  • 【文献出处】 河南财经政法大学学报 ,Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law , 编辑部邮箱 ,2017年03期
  • 【分类号】D926.5
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】5500
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络