【摘要】 聚合类视频APP著作权侵权认定有间接侵权说与直接侵权说之争,法院对此类案件的裁判结果也不统一,存在同案不同判现象。深度链接在客观上满足了公开提供作品和"交互式"传播两个要素,是对权利人信息网络传播权的直接侵犯,因此,直接侵权说更符合利益平衡原则。应遵循侵权四要件分析的基本路径,采用"直接提供作品"的法律标准界定信息网络传播行为,并以此规范聚合类视频APP的侵权认定。更多还原

【Abstract】 There are two theories about the cognizance of copyright infringement on aggregate video app: direct infringement and indirect infringement. Currently, our courts have different judgements on the issue, and there are different trail results among similar cases. Deep links can meet the two elements of providing the work in public and disseminating it interactively, therefore, deep links directly infringe the right to communicate works to the public over information networks. Considering that, direct infringement doctrine conforms to the principle of interests balance better. We should recognize the four elements of tort, and choose the ’legal standard’ to decide internet spread of information behavior, and thus to regulate direct infringement of aggregate video app.更多还原