【摘要】 《刑法修正案(九)》确立了贪污罪和受贿罪的"数额"和"非数额情节"并重的双轨定罪量刑标准,但是,新司法解释对这一定罪量刑标准中的"非数额情节"标准存在认识偏差。新司法解释实质上仅规定了定罪量刑的数额标准,它并没有规定单独的、详细的"非数额情节"定罪量刑标准,从而导致"非数额情节"定罪量刑标准不具有明确性,从而不便于司法操作,不利于司法统一,为此,应建构一个科学的"非数额情节"定罪量刑标准体系。为了适应形势变化发展,有必要建立贪污受贿的双轨定罪量刑标准之定期调整机制。为了更好地实现个案公正,要对我国现行的酌定减轻处罚制度进行修改、完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 Amendment IX to Criminal Law has established a double-track conviction and punishment standard for corruption and bribery considering both amount-related and non-amount circumstances,the latter of which,however,turns out to be confusion in the new judicial interpretation.The new judicial interpretation has essentially clarified only amount-related standards,but not non-amount standards in an independent and detailed manner,which renders non-amount standards unclear and impediments judicial practices and judicial integration.Thus,a scientific system for non-amount conviction and punishment standards is necessary.In adaption to the changing climates,it is imperative to set up a periodic adjustment mechanism for the double-track conviction and punishment standard for corruption and bribery.And in order to better realize justice in individual cases,amendments and optimizations are needed on the principle of discretionary mitigated punishment.更多还原