节点文献

基于利益相关和相对剥夺感的群体性事件动机城乡对比

Comparison of Urban and Rural Motivations of Mass Incidents Based on Stakeholders and Relative Deprivation

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 梁枫任荣明

【Author】 LIANG Feng;REN Rongming;Shanghai Jiao Tong University;

【机构】 上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院

【摘要】 民众参与群体性事件的动机根据作用路径可分为直接动机与间接动机。本文利用中国综合社会调查(CGSS)2010年的数据进行实证分析,结果显示:作为直接动机和间接动机关键衡量指标的利益相关和相对剥夺感对群体性事件均具有显著影响。进一步对不同动机进行城乡对比分析后发现:城乡样本在直接动机方面差别不大,但在间接动机方面,农村样本仅受心理收入剥夺感显著影响,而城市样本仅受经济阶层剥夺感显著影响。因此,在切实回应民众利益诉求、解决损害民众利益问题的同时,还需有效增加农民收入、注重城市居民阶层感受、保证资源分配和社会选择的公平,以促进中国城乡社会稳定。

【Abstract】 Motivations of people in mass incidents can be divided into direct and indirect motivations based on the active route. This paper,using data from the CGSS2010,turns out that both stakeholders and relative deprivation as the key indexes of direct and indirect motivations have significant effect on mass incidents. Further comparative analysis of different motivations of urban and rural areas shows that in direct motivation,there is little difference between urban and rural samples,but in direct motivation,rural samples are only significantly affected by psychological income deprivation,while urban samples are only significantly affected by the sense of deprivation of economic class. Therefore,the government should effectively respond to interests and demands of the public,and at the same time,effectively increase the income of farmers,emphasis the class-oriented feeling of urban residents and ensure the equality of resource allocation and social choice in order to promote social stability of both urban and rural social areas.

【基金】 国家社会科学基金重大项目“群体行为涌现机理及风险辨识研究”(11&ZD174)
  • 【文献出处】 经济与管理研究 ,Research on Economics and Management , 编辑部邮箱 ,2017年01期
  • 【分类号】C912.68;D631.43
  • 【被引频次】17
  • 【下载频次】657
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络