节点文献

伦敦、里约奥运会中国男篮进攻方式与得分效率比较研究

Comparative Study on Offensive Way and the Score Difference Efficiency of China Men’s Basketball Team in London and Rio DE Janeiro Olympic Games

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张利超金龙李宁

【Author】 ZHANG Li-chao;JIN Long;LI Ning;Department of Physical Education,Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering;Henan universit School of Physical Educationy;Guangdong AIB Polytechnic College,PE Dept;

【机构】 仲恺农业工程学院体育部河南大学体育学院广东农工商职业技术学院基础部

【摘要】 通过比较中国男篮30、31届奥运会所有比赛,找出伦敦、里约奥运会中国男篮进攻投篮方式与得分效率差异,为中国队下一届奥运会比赛做参考。采用录像观察法等,运用新奥特喜马拉雅非线性编辑软件和Adobe Premiere Pro CS3非线性编辑软件,将两届奥运会中国男篮所有比赛每一次进攻投篮切割出并做分类统计,计算出中国队每名球员进攻方式及技术数据,再使用SPSS13.0进行统计分析。得出结论,30届奥运会中国队提高了进攻速度,注重个人强攻,依靠突破寻找得分机会。31届里约奥运会,队员中距离得分较为稳定,个人突破进攻稳定性有明显提高,把握快攻机会较好,但外线队员三分远投得分能力偏低,突破分球为同伴创造投篮机会不多,创造快攻能力不足。

【Abstract】 In order to make useful suggestions for the future competitions for the Chinese male basketball team,this paper compared all the competitions in the 30 th and 31 st Olympic Games,to identify the difference of attack mode and scoring efficiency between the two sessions. By using video analysis,Himalaya NLE System and Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 and SPSS13. 0 statistical analysis from the perspective of quantitative,the paper draws the conclusion that the Chinese improve the speed of offensive,emphasize personal attack and find chances to score by breakthrough in 30 th Olympic Games. In the 31 st Olympic Games the players’ perimeter shot is more stable,they grasp the opportunity of fast break better. However,the perimeter players’ three-point ability is low,they can’t using dribble draw dish to create the shooting chance for teammates well,and lack of ability to create the fast break.

【基金】 广东省哲学社会科学“十二五”规划2015学科共建项目(GD15XTY16);广东省教育厅2015创新强校教育科研类项目(2015GXJK052)
  • 【文献出处】 广州体育学院学报 ,Journal of Guangzhou Sport University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2017年03期
  • 【分类号】G841
  • 【被引频次】18
  • 【下载频次】292
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络