【摘要】 消费非饱和性与生产过剩的矛盾冲突是一种理论幻觉。这种幻觉源于对狭义消费与广义消费两种不同概念的混用。狭义的消费概念包含效用性和消耗性两个基本内涵。广义消费保留狭义消费的效用性规定,而放弃其消耗性规定,将意愿储蓄纳入消费范畴之中。在储蓄性消费中,商品的使用价值与价值可以在时间上和空间上分离开来。因此,储蓄性消费有两种独立的形态:一种是实物型储蓄性消费,它与消耗型消费一起构成实物型消费,具有可饱和性;另一种是价值型储蓄性消费,具有非饱和性。生产过剩是相对于实物型消费而言的,非饱和性则是相对于价值型消费或者总消费而言的,二者是可以并存的。一部分家庭对价值型储蓄性消费的追求导致另一部分家庭不得不进行非意愿的实物性储蓄。更多还原

【Abstract】 The conflict between production surplus and consumption non-satiation is of theoretical illusion.The illusion derives from a confused understanding about special consumption and generalized consumption.Special consumption can be defined with two basic connotations,utility and consumptiveness. Generalized consumption brings desired savings into the scope of consumptiveness and reserves the utility of special consumption while eliminating the stipulation of consumptiveness. As for consumption for saving,the use value and the value of the goods can be separated in time and space. Therefore,there are two independent forms of the consumption for saving:material consumption for saving and value consumption for saving. Material consumption for saving and consumable consumption constitute material consumption,which could be saturated. However,value consumption for saving is non-satiation. Production surplus is related to the case of material consumption while non-satiation is bound up with the value consumption or the total consumption,which are compatible. Some families pursue value consumption for saving. As a result,other families have to take unintended material savings.更多还原