节点文献
升/降流式生物活性炭滤池处理微污染湖泊水比较
Comparison of Up-flow and Down-flow BAC for Micro-polluted Lake Water Treatment
【摘要】 比较了升流式和降流式生物活性炭滤池(BAC)处理微污染湖泊水的效果,分析了两种炭池的生物量和活性,评估其出水生物安全性差异。结果表明,升流式BAC出水平均浊度(0.38 NTU)稍高于降流式(0.26 NTU);而前者对CODMn的去除率(60.3%)高于后者(55.4%),且对UV254的去除率(75.3%)也高于后者(67.1%)。升流式BAC的微生物分布(7.616.6 nmol P/cm3)比降流式更均匀(4.919.7 nmol P/cm3,主要集中在上300 mm炭层);前者单位活性炭的比耗氧速率(SOUR)为7.9×10-3mg O2/(cm3·h),高于后者的6.5×10-3mg O2/(cm3·h)。然而,升流式BAC出水中平均菌落数(17 CFU/m L)略高于降流式(12 CFU/m L),可以通过设置砂滤池来保障微生物安全性。
【Abstract】 The pollutants removal efficiencies,spatial distribution of microbial biomass and activity in up-flow/down-flow BAC filters were studied during treatment of micro-polluted lake water. Meanwhile,the bio-safety of their effluents was compared to evaluate the performance of two types of BAC.The results indicated that the average turbidity of up-flow BAC filters was 0. 38 NTU,which was slightly higher than that of down-flow BAC filters(0. 26 NTU); the former could remove organic pollutants more effectively(60. 3%) than the latter( 55. 4%). Meanwhile,the removal efficiencies of the former for UV254(75. 3%) was higher than that of the latter(67. 1%). The up-flow BAC showed more homogeneous biomass distribution( 7. 6-16. 6 nmol P/cm3) than that of down-flow BAC(4. 9-19. 7 nmol P/cm3); moreover,the specific oxygen uptake rate(SOUR) per unit volume media of up-flow BAC was a-round 7. 9 × 10-3 mgO2/( cm3·h),which was higher than that of down-flow mode 6. 5 × 10-3 mgO2/(cm3·h). However,the average bacterial colony number of the up-flow BAC effluent(17 CFU/m L)was slightly higher than that of down-flow BAC effluent(12 CFU/m L). The bio-safety could be ensured by the subsequent sand filter.
【Key words】 biological activated carbon filter; up-flow; down-flow; pollutants removal; bio-safety;
- 【文献出处】 中国给水排水 ,China Water & Wastewater , 编辑部邮箱 ,2017年19期
- 【分类号】TU991.2
- 【被引频次】8
- 【下载频次】202