【摘要】 目的比较两种消毒剂对口腔门诊物体表面消毒效果,为口腔门诊选择合理的物体表面消毒剂提供参考。方法分别用含浓度500 mg/L的含氯消毒剂(常规组)和伽玛消毒湿巾(试验组)对口腔门诊综合治疗椅控制面板、诊疗台等物体表面进行消毒,比较两组表面消毒后的杀菌率及消毒合格率。结果进行物体表面消毒后10 min,常规组杀菌率(91.66±7.52)%,试验组杀菌率(93.87±6.12)%,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);消毒合格率均为100%。结论伽玛消毒湿巾与含氯消毒剂对口腔门诊物体表面的消毒效果相似。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To compare the bacteriostatic effect of two disinfections on the surface of frequently touched objects in dental clinic,so as to provide the reference for proper disinfection.Methods Specimens from the control panel and surface of examination table of comprehensive treatment chair were taken for bacterial culture,record the bacteria content on the objects surface.Then disinfect the objects surface by using 500 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant(routing group) and Gamma disinfecting wet wipes(test group) respectively,compare the qualified rate of bacteriostasis on object surfaces between two group.Results After 10-minute disinfection on surfaces,bacteriostatic rate of routing group and test group was(91.66±7.52)% and(93.87±6.12)% respectively,there was no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The quaternary ammonium disinfectant for the dental clinic objects can reach the same effect as chlorine-containing disinfectant.更多还原