【摘要】 从是否存在上位法的角度划分,我国地方立法存在"执行性立法"和"实验性立法"两种类型。地方"执行性立法"以不抵触上位法为原则,地方"实验性立法"以不存在上位法为要件。地方"实验性立法"实践中存在形式上无上位法、实质上存在上位法,因而面临为了不抵触上位法"实验性立法"目标就无法实现的困境;这一困境源于当前我国分工型立法体制。解决这一难题的根本之策是修改现行宪法和组织法,在中央与地方之间进行事权的法治化划分,实行分权型立法体制;在暂不具备立法体制根本变革条件的前提下,权宜之计是地方"实验性立法"前应当就是否存在上位法(包括显性的上位法和隐性的上位法)进行细致论证。更多还原

【Abstract】 There are two kinds of local legislations in mainland Chinese,the executive legislation and the experimental legislation. There into,local executive legislation based on principle which is not inconsistent with the upper law,and the experimental legislation is built on the absence of the upper law. In practice,the upper law of local experimental legislation existed in essence although did not exist in form,so there is no violation of the upper law,which caused the aim of the experimental legislation couldn’t achieve. This dilemma rooted in the current De-concentration Legislative System in mainland Chinese. The fundamental approach to this problem is to modify the current Constitution and Organization Law,divide the authority of office between the central and the local by law,and implement the Decentralization legislation system. Under the premise that the legislation system couldn’t transform fundamentally,the detailed investigation became an expedient measure to local experimental legislation.更多还原