目的:比较肱骨干骨折手术与非手术治疗方法的临床疗效,以期指导临床选择。方法:连续入选2005年3月至2012年10月间有完整随访资料的患者252例,根据治疗方法的不同将患者分为保守治疗组和手术内固定组,其中保守治疗组76例使用石膏或小夹板固定骨折,手术内固定组176例使用切开复位钢板或髓内针固定骨折。对两组间并发症发生率、骨折愈合时间、骨折愈合率、Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分和Mayo肘关节功能评分等参数进行比较。结果:平均随访(31.24±20.06)个月。两组数据在年龄、开放骨折数量、骨折部位和AO(Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen)分类方面差异没有统计学意义。骨折愈合率:保守治疗组96.1%(73/76),手术内固定组97.7%(172/176),P=0.46;骨折愈合时间:保守治疗组(10.24±2.93)周,手术内固定组(10.69±2.51)周,P=0.22;并发症发生率:保守治疗组5.3%(4/76例),手术内固定组15.3%(27/176例),P=0.025;其中骨折不愈合率:保守治疗组3.95%(3/76),手术内固定组2...
【英文摘要】
Objective: To compare the difference between non-operative and operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Methods: From March 2005 to October 2012,252 cases of humeral shaft fractures were treated and were adequately followed up. According to the treatment methods,the patients were divided into 2 groups: the non-operative group and the operative group. In the non-operative group,there were 76 cases treated with plaster/small splint fixation,meanwhile there were 176 cases treated with internal fixation ...
| 
推荐 
点击下列相关研究机构和相关文献作者，可以直接查到这些机构和作者被《中国知识资源总库》收录的其它文献，使您全面了解该机构和该作者的研究动态和历史。
