节点文献

论微信舆论的自由难题和伦理限度

On difficulty and ethical limitation of public opinions on We Chat

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 李丽

【Author】 LI Li;School of Humanity, Southeast University;

【机构】 东南大学人文学院哲学与科学系

【摘要】 微信这款新兴的社交工具形式上为其受众群带来了全所未有的"表达自由",促进民间舆论逐渐从"被时代"走向了"我时代"。但微信舆论场中却自动生成了信息中下阶层的自由难题:微信舆论场中信息中下阶层的自由不能获得保障和无力反抗利益集团及不法分子的信息资源控制。其归因于信息中下阶层基本生存权益保障的失位、信息中下阶层道德文化建设的缺位以及有利于人的全面发展的社会环境的空位。所以应该"为微信舆论立法",确立微信舆论的伦理限度。应秉承以真实性原则为首要原则、以不伤害原则为核心原则、以良知原则为延伸原则和以生命至上原则为根本原则的四项微信舆论伦理基本原则,建立起绿色、和谐、公正、优雅的微信舆论场。

【Abstract】 We Chat, as a new social communication tool, brings an unprecedented freedom of expression and causes a change from "era of passive tense" to "era of ego." But civilian public opinions on We Chat automatically generate the difficulty of freedom that middle-lower classes in information can not be protected in the freedom and are often powerless to resist the control from interest groups and criminals. It owes to the lack of the protection of existence rights, absence of construction of moral culture in information-lower-middle class and vacancy in social environment which is essentially beneficial to all-round development of human beings. Therefore, it is necessary to legislate for public opinions on We Chat and establish ethical limitations, such as authenticity as the primary principle, non-maleficence as the core principle, justice as the scalability principle and respect as the cardinal principle. Only in this way, can a green, harmonious, just and gracious society be set up.

【基金】 中央高校基本科研业务费和江苏省2014年普通高校研究生科研创新工程项目(KYZZ-0048)
  • 【文献出处】 中南大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Central South University(Social Science) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2016年02期
  • 【分类号】B82-05
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】421
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络