【摘要】 观察微创引流术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效,比较开颅术与微创术的手术效果。回顾分析笔者所在医院422例高血压脑出血患者临床资料,135例行常规开颅术治疗的患者为对照组,287例行微创引流术治疗的患者为观察组,比较两组患者的术后神经损伤程度评分、生活能力和运动障碍等级。术后7d对照组的神经损伤程度评分为(21.5±1.3)分,观察组为(15.1±1.4)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1个月,观察组患者生活自理能力和运动协调性强于对照组(P<0.05)。高血压脑出血患者采用微创引流术治疗后神经损伤程度小,并发症少,临床效果显著。更多还原

【Abstract】 Observe the curative effect of minimally invasive drainage in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.This article compared clinical effects between the craniotomy and minimally invasive drainage.This article retrospective analyzed the clinical data of 422 cases of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients.135 cases who adopted craniotomy were selected as control group,287 cases who adopted minimally invasive drainage were selected as observation group.This article compared the degree of nerve injury after treatment,living ability and dyskinesia rating of the two groups.7d postoperation,the nerve injury score of the control group was 21.5 ± 1.3,while the observation group was 15.1 ± 1.4.The difference had statistical significance(P <0.05).1 month after operation,the self-care ability and motor coordination of observation group was better than control group(P<0.05).Minimally invasive drainage have less nerve injury and complications in treating hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.It has an obvious effect.更多还原