节点文献
中国执法船黄岩岛领海执法活动的合法性——评南海仲裁案第13项诉求及其裁决的荒谬性
The Legitimacy of Chinese Vessels’ Law Enforcement Activities in the Territorial Sea of Huangyan Dao——Comments on the Fallacy of Submission 13 and the Award thereon in the South China Sea Arbitration Case
【摘要】 菲律宾在其单方提起的中国南海仲裁案第13项诉求中,指责中国执法船在黄岩岛领海内驶近拦截菲律宾执法船的操作造成了严重碰撞危险,违反了《国际海上避碰规则》和《联合国海洋法公约》的相关规定。中国对黄岩岛及其领海享有无可争辩的主权。菲律宾执法船进入黄岩岛领海并非无害通过。对此,无论基于法理或航海技术,中国执法船均有权依据《联合国海洋法公约》第25条的规定制止此类非无害通过,而不受《国际海上避碰规则》的束缚。仲裁庭无视中国对黄岩岛的领海主权而对此作出的裁决是荒谬的。
【Abstract】 the Philippines,in Submission 13 of the South China Sea Arbitration Case unilaterally instituted by it,alleged that Chinese law enforcement vessels’ approaching and blocking of Philippine vessels in the territorial sea of Huangyan Dao had caused serious risk of collision to those Philippine vessels,thereby violated relevant provisions of the Collision Regulations and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. China has indisputable sovereignty over Huangyan Dao and its territorial sea.The Philippine law enforcement vessels entered the territorial sea of Huangyan Dao for non-innocent passage,in respect of which,the Chinese law enforcement vessels were entitled to prevent such non-innocent passage in accordance with Article 25 of UNCLOS,without restrictions from the Collision Regulations,based on either legal principles or nautical science. The Award made by the Arbitration Court on Submission 13 is fallacious because it has disregarded China’s sovereignty over the territorial sea of Huangyan Dao.
【Key words】 South China Sea; arbitration; territorial sea; COLREGS; UNCLOS;
- 【文献出处】 亚太安全与海洋研究 ,Asia-Pacific Security and Maritime Affairs , 编辑部邮箱 ,2016年05期
- 【分类号】D993.5
- 【被引频次】4
- 【下载频次】308