节点文献

自体血小板分离技术在全弓置换术中的初步应用

Primary application of autologous platelet-rich plasma during replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic arch

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 罗智超彭东周成斌钟执文林中林章晓华范瑞新

【Author】 Luo Zhi-chao;Peng Dong;Zhou Cheng-bin;Zhong Zhi-wen;Lin Zhong-lin;Zhang Xiao-hua;Fan Rui-xin;Department of Perfusion,Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute,Guangdong General Hospital,Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences,The First Medical College of South China University of Technology,Guangdong Southern-China Key Laboratory of Structural Heart Disease;

【机构】 广东省心血管病研究所,广东省人民医院,广东省医学科学院,华南理工大学第一临床医学院,广东省华南结构性心脏病重点实验室体外循环科广东省心血管病研究所,广东省人民医院心外科

【摘要】 目的回顾性分析术前自体血小板分离技术在全弓置换术中对血液保护的作用。方法 2015年1月至6月共72例主动脉夹层(Stanford A),行全主动脉弓置换术,术中均使用血液回收技术。术前行自体血小板分离技术者为血小板分离组(n=28),未使用者为对照组(n=44)。手术均在深、中低温停循环和顺行脑灌注下完成。血小板分离组在深静脉置管后开始血小板分离,形成浓缩红细胞、血浆和富含血小板血浆三种成分。体外循环结束,鱼精蛋白中和肝素后开始回输三种成分。记录术前血小板分离的量,监测分离前后的激活凝血时间(ACT)数值,比较异体血制品的使用情况,观察患者术后24 h内胸液量、开胸止血率以及ICU停留时间等。结果两组年龄、体重、体外循环时间、阻断时间、停循环时间和最低温度之间没有显著差异。术前血小板分离组处理全血(1 704±244)ml,获得富含血小板血浆(225±51)ml、血浆(898±107)ml和红细胞(569±119)ml。分离后ACT数值延长(P<0.05)。体外循环结束后,术后24 h内胸液量和开胸止血率在两组间没有显著差异。但住院期间对照组使用血小板、血浆、冷沉淀的数量明显高于术前血小板分离组(P<0.05),ICU停留时间在两组间没有显著差异。结论全弓置换大血管手术前自体血小板分离技术可以减少围术期异体血制品的输注,提升血液保护效果。

【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the effect of autologous platelet-rich plasma(aPRP) transfusion as a blood conservationtechnique during aortic surgery.Methods Between January 2015 and June 2015, 72 patients who diagnosed with aortic dissection(Stanford A style) underwent ascending aorta and total aortic arch replacement using deep hypothermic circuit arrest( DHCA). Agroup of 28 patients in which aPRP was used(aPRP group) were compared with the control group of 44 patients who didn’t use aPRP.Collection of aPRP was performed after deep vein catheterization. Autologous blood was separated into three ingredients including con-centrated red blood cells, plasma and aPRP before systemic infusion of heparin. After CPB and neutralization of protamine, three ingre-dients were transfused. Requirement of perioperative allogeneic transfusion and clinical outcomes including chest drainage and length ofpostoperative ICU stay were analyzed.Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, body weight, bypasstime, cross-clamping time, and the lowest temperature. Perioperative allogeneic transfusions were fewer in the aPRP group comparedwith that of control group(P<0.05). However, there were no significant difference between the two groups in chest drainage and thelength of postoperative ICU stay.Conclusion The utilization of aPRP is associated with reduction in allogeneic blood transfusion andhemostatic agent use during the ascending and totalarch replacement, which improve blood conservation.

  • 【文献出处】 中国体外循环杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Extracorporeal Circulation , 编辑部邮箱 ,2016年03期
  • 【分类号】R654.1
  • 【被引频次】12
  • 【下载频次】107
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络