节点文献

造影剂用量与肾小球滤过率比值预测PCI术后造影剂肾病的临床意义

The clinical significance of predicting the contrast-induced nephropathy after PCI by the ratio of contrast medium volume and glomerular filtration rate

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 滕树恩; 黄铮; 洪承路; 朱庭延; 袁秀; 陈燕玉; 刘深荣; 谢晋国;

【Author】 TENG Shu-en;HUANG Zheng;HONG Cheng-lu;ZHU Ting-yan;YUAN Xiu;CHEN Yan-yu;LIU Shen-rong;XIE Jin-guo;Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University;

【机构】 南方医科大学南方医院心内科;

【摘要】 目的:探讨造影剂用量与肾小球滤过率比值(CM/eGFR)对预测PCI术后造影剂肾病(CIN)发生的临床意义。方法:纳入2014年5月至2015年10月在南方医院行PCI手术的患者307例.根据术后72 h内是否发生CIN,分为CIN组(29例)、非CIN组(278例),并根据术前血肌酐(sCr)、胱抑素C(CyC)浓度分别计算基础肾功能eGFRMDRD、eGFRCyC。结果:PCI术后造影剂肾病发生率9.4%(29/307),基线资料显示CIN组在年龄、CM、NTpro-BNP、IABP、围术期低血压、术前sCr及CyC均与非CIN组具有明显差异(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic分析显示年龄、心功能(≥Ⅲ级)、术后IABP、使用CCB、CM/eGFRMDRD、CM/eGFRCyC等因素均是影响CIN发生的独立相关因素,ROC曲线分析示CM/eGFRMDRD曲线下面积为0.838、CM/eGFRCyC曲线下面积为0.805,两者的AUC无统计学差异;灵敏度及特异度分别为79.3%、76.3%,CM/eGFRMDRD临界值为2.095。结论:作为新指标的CM/eGFRMDRD与CM/eGFRCyC比值,均可作为目前评估造影剂最大剂量及预测PCI术后CIN发生的良好方法,且两者无明显差异。

【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the significance of contrast medium(CM) volume and estimated glomerular filtration rate(CM/eGFR) in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy(CIN) after PCI.Methods A total of 307 patients after PCI were enrolled from Nanfang Hospital from May 2014 to October 2015.The patients were divided into the CIN group(n=29) and the non-CIN group(n=278) according to whether CIN within 72 hours after PCI.The baseline renal function was assessed by the sCr and CyC,respectively.Results Twentynine patients(9.4%,29/307) developed CIN.There were significant differences in Age,CM、NTpro-BNP、IABP、Periprocedural Hypotension、Preprocedural sCr/CyC between two groups(P<0.05,respectively).The result of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that Age,Cardiac function ≥Ⅲ level,IABP,use CCB,CM/eGFRMDRD,CM/eGFRCyC were independent risk predictors for CIN,respectively.Receiver Operating Characteristic(ROC) curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of CM/eGFRMDRD(AUC= 0.838) was superior to CM/eGFRCyC(AUC=0.805) without significant difference.The sensitivity and specificity were 79.3%and 76.3%(Cut-off Point=2.094),respectively.Conclusion Both the CM/eGFRMDRD and CM/eGFRCyC may be good methods to determine maximum CM before PCI and to predict CIN after PCI currently,without significant differences between these two predictors.

  • 【文献出处】 实用医学杂志 ,The Journal of Practical Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2016年14期
  • 【分类号】R692;R541.4
  • 【被引频次】17
  • 【下载频次】189
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络