节点文献

儿童体质健康:从BMI与体脂肪率的差异谈起

Physical Fitness for Children: A Perspective on Category of BMI and Body Fat Percentage

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 郭强龚建华尹小俭

【Author】 GUO Qiang;GONG Jianhua;YIN Xiaojian;College of Physical Education and Health,East China Normal University;Key Laboratory of Adolescent Health Assessment and Exercise Intervention,Ministry of Education;

【机构】 华东师范大学体育与健康学院"青少年健康评价与运动干预"教育部重点实验室

【摘要】 目的:基于身体质量指数(BMI)与体脂肪率(BF%)不同肥胖分类标准的差异,考察儿童体质健康指标分布的异同。方法:以上海市393名学龄儿童为研究对象,通过整群抽样法,对参与研究的学生进行身体形态、身体成分及身体素质测量,通过LMS法和线性回归等方法,考察体征指标的分布特征。结果:基于BMI和BF%的不同分类标准,对应的腰围、基础代谢率、立定跳远等指标均反映出了较大差异,男、女生腰围、立定跳远、基础代谢率之间存在显著性差异。结论:BMI与"金标准"BF%划分的儿童肥胖率不一致,对应的各项体征指标的分布存在较大差异性。

【Abstract】 Purpose: Based on the differences between BMI( Body Mass Index) and BF%( Body Percentage) in obesity classification criteria,the study examines the similarities and differences among body shape,body composition and physical fitness. Methods: the subjects are 393 elementary school students in Shanghai,whose body shape,body composition and physical fitness are measured. LMS and linear regression are used to investigate the distribution characteristics of physical sign indexes. Results: waist circumference,basal metabolic rate,standing long jump and other indicators showed great differences based on different obesity classification criteria by BMI and BF%. Conclusions: The recognition of obesity for children by classification criteria of BMI and the "gold standard"BF% is not exactly the same. The classification criteria of BMI and BF% have significant differences.

【基金】 上海市教育委员会创新项目:上海市儿童青少年腰围与BMI的研究(13ZS032);上海教育委员会学校体育重点项目:上海市学龄儿童腰围标准的研究(HJTY-2012-C06)
  • 【文献出处】 沈阳体育学院学报 ,Journal of Shenyang Sport University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2016年03期
  • 【分类号】G804.49
  • 【被引频次】12
  • 【下载频次】817
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络