【摘要】 目的 定量分析《实用放射学杂志》与《中华放射学杂志》的基金论文，探讨提升《实用放射学杂志》期刊质量和学术水平的有效途径。方法 采用文献计量学方法，对2种期刊2013年基金论文的发文量、基金论文比、级别分布、地域分布、机构分布和发表时滞分布等文献计量指标进行统计分析。结果 《实用放射学杂志》2013年共发表论文618篇，其中基金论文共计137篇，占论文总数的22.2%,基金论文比0.22,省市级基金项目论文占59.2%;基金论文来自全国23个地区和82个机构；基金论文平均发表时滞235.6 d。《中华放射学杂志》2013年共发表论文313篇，其中基金论文共计97篇，占论文总数的31.0%,基金论文比0.31,国家级基金项目论文占32.0%;基金论文来自全国18个地区和70个机构；基金论文平均发表时滞228.4 d。结论 《实用放射学杂志》有其自身优势，对比《中华放射学杂志》也存在显著的差距和不足。该刊要在选题策划、主动约稿、优稿优用、缩短发表时滞以及建立核心作者群和核心专家库等方面有所改进和突破，可进一步提升刊物的质量内涵和学术水平。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To quantitatively analyze the fund theses published in the Journal of Practical Radiology(JPR) and Chinese Journal of Radiology(CJR) in order to detect effective approaches to the improvement of the journal quality and academic level of the JPR.Methods The number of funds-supported theses published,the ratio of fund theses,grade,regional,source of institutions and publication time-lag distribution of the fund theses were statistically analyzed by using bibliometrics in the two journals in 2013.Results Six hundred and eighteen theses were published in JPR in 2013,the total number of fund theses were 137(accounted for 22.2% of total articles),the ratio of fund theses were 0.22,the provincial and municipal fund theses accounted for 59.2%.All fund theses were from 23 regions and 82 institutions throughout the country.The average of publication time-lag was 235.6 days.Three hundred and thirteen theses were published in CJR in 2013,the total number of fund theses were 97(accounted for 31.0% of total articles),the ratio of fund theses were 0.31,the provincial and municipal fund theses accounted for 32.0%.All fund theses were from 18 regions and 70 institutions throughout the country.The average of publication time-lag was 228.4 days.Conclusion JPR has its own superiority,meanwhile,it also has a significant disparity and insufficiency comparing to CJR.In order to further promote the quality connotations and the academic level of JPR,efforts should be made on subject selection and planning,initiative collection of manuscripts,priority publishment to excellent manuscripts,shortening publication time-lag,etc.Additionally,a database of core authors and experts should be established.更多还原