节点文献

价值规范由心生出如何成为可能——浪漫主义道德价值判断的心学解读

Romanticism and Neo-Confucianism in the View of Moral Value Criterion

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 黄琳张再林

【Author】 Huang Lin;Zhang Zailin;Northwestern Polytechnical University;Xi’an Jiaotong University;

【机构】 西北工业大学马克思主义学院西安交通大学哲学系

【摘要】 浪漫主义与心学同为价值由心,但一则为"我心创造",一则为"理自心出"。由浪漫主义并非自由自律的"意志"直接导向行为的后果,与明末心学亚流之流于狂荡恣肆何其相似,但特定概念的语义歧出,并不意味着思想和智慧的原初层面也如是,而就此忘却心学思想本有的理论与工夫曲折。心学诚意工夫所以可能的超越根据在于明觉良知,以"诚"为契入点,心学与浪漫主义之异同即可了然。

【Abstract】 Both Romanticism and the Ming school of mind emphasize sincerity.On the part of Romanticism moral motivation is regarded as far more important than an action’s results;it puts focus on the subject’s inner life,and emphasizes that one must be absolutely sincere in realizing one’s belief,even though it might unfortunately bring about rather bad results.Such a view heavily influenced liberalism,existentialism,nationalism,and fascism as well.Similarly,some followers of the late Ming school of mind were totally untrammeled in behavior because they thought that they were able to grasp the inner knowledge though a glimpse.However,in moral cultivation the inner knowledge as transcendent being must be supported by comprehensive moral efforts.To make ones’ mind sincere is,in this regard,no other than the efforts of extending the inner knowledge.It is the true Ming Neo-Confucian esprit as is essentially different from Romanticism.

【基金】 陕西省社会科学基金项目“明代心学与欧洲浪漫主义的比较研究”(立项号:2015C007),2015-2018;“西北工业大学人文社科创新类项目”(立项号:3102016RW012)
  • 【分类号】B018
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】201
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络