【摘要】 我国人文社科奖励活动因其衡量标准难以划一,一直是国家奖励体制中的薄弱环节。如何通过技术和制度手段最大限度提高该领域评奖活动中的纯度以增强其公信力和权威性,是学术界和政府层面的一大难题。本文基于这一现实背景,在构造全新分析框架基础上提出评奖结果偏离度这一新的研究命题,并以目前最高等级人文社科奖项中的教育学科论文类获奖成果为例展开定量研究。结果显示:教育学科论文评奖结果在影响深度偏离度Ⅰ和影响广度偏离度Ⅰ上均存在不同程度的显著负向偏离,且呈现影响深度偏离度Ⅰ逐步降低而影响广度偏离度Ⅰ逐步增强的态势;而影响深度偏离度Ⅱ和影响广度偏离度Ⅱ主要呈现显著正向偏离态势,表明获奖成果等级分布趋于合理。未来完善人文社科评奖活动的着力重点应是改进评奖方法与评价标准,完善评奖专家产生机制及行为规范,健全评奖程序并建立有效的问责制度。更多还原

【Abstract】 The incentive programs in humanities and social sciences are always the weak link in the national awards system because of its lack of uniform metrics. How to enhance the transparency of the award selection through technical and institutional measures in the field of humanities and social sciences in order to enhance its credibility and authority is a major problem to academia and policymakers. Against this background,this paper put forward a new proposition about results of China’s significant awards in humanities and social sciences by constructing a new analysis framework. This paper did a quantitative study on the highest level of achievement awards in humanities and social sciences( temporarily limited to the subject of the paper award results in education discipline). The results showed that there were significantly negative deviations in varying degrees of depth deviation degree Ⅰ and breadth deviation degree Ⅰ. The trend was that the depth deviation degree Ⅰ was reduced gradually while the breadth deviation degreeⅠwas strengthening. The results also showed a positive deviation trend in both the depth deviation degree Ⅱ and the breadth deviation degreeⅡ,indicating that the achievements rating awards have become rational. In the future,to improve the humanities and social sciences awards,efforts should be focused on improving the methods and evaluation standards,perfecting the expert generation mechanism and conduct code,improving the awards program and the establishment of an effective accountability system.更多还原